We have compiled a list of manufacturers, distributors, product information, reference prices, and rankings for Earthquake construction method.
ipros is IPROS GMS IPROS One of the largest technical database sites in Japan that collects information on.

Earthquake construction method×フロアエージェント - List of Manufacturers, Suppliers, Companies and Products

Earthquake construction method Product List

1~3 item / All 3 items

Displayed results

Re-vibration Method: "Benefits of Re-vibration and High-Density Method"

Ideal for factories, warehouses, and roads! 7 benefits of high-density 200-year concrete.

The re-vibration and high-density concrete method is a construction technique that removes voids and water pathways that cause cracking, meticulously forms an effective structure within the concrete, and aims to improve density. This construction method offers seven benefits: "high density," "smooth floor level," "reduction in material costs," "significant suppression of cracking," "reduction in repair costs," "enhanced delay effect of carbonation," and "increased real estate value." 【Seven Benefits】 1. High density 2. Smooth floor level 3. Reduction in material costs 4. Suppression of cracking 5. Reduction in repair costs 6. Enhanced delay effect of carbonation 7. Increased real estate value *For more details, please refer to the catalog or feel free to contact us.

  • others

Added to bookmarks

Bookmarks list

Bookmark has been removed

Bookmarks list

You can't add any more bookmarks

By registering as a member, you can increase the number of bookmarks you can save and organize them with labels.

Free membership registration

Re-vibration construction method: "Differences from conventional vibration tampers"

Ideal for factories, warehouses, and roads! High-density 200-year concrete: Three differences from conventional equipment.

The re-vibration and high-density concrete method is a construction technique that removes voids and water channels that cause cracking, and forms a dense effective structure within the concrete to improve its density. There are three differences between the conventional vibration tamper and the vibration tamper used in the re-vibration and high-density concrete method regarding their capabilities to remove footprints, maintain floor level, and eliminate water channels. 【Three Differences from Conventional Vibration Tamper】 1. Footprint Removal Capability ⇒ The conventional vibration tamper has a narrow compaction area, making it impossible to remove footprints. 2. Floor Level Maintenance Capability ⇒ The conventional vibration tamper sinks into the floor, making it difficult to maintain floor level and prone to damage. 3. Significant Water Channel Removal ⇒ The conventional vibration tamper has a narrow compaction area, resulting in insufficient removal of water channels. *For more details, please refer to the catalog or feel free to contact us.

  • others

Added to bookmarks

Bookmarks list

Bookmark has been removed

Bookmarks list

You can't add any more bookmarks

By registering as a member, you can increase the number of bookmarks you can save and organize them with labels.

Free membership registration

Re-vibration Method: "Differences Between Conventional Methods and Re-vibration Methods"

Ideal for factories, warehouses, and roads! High-density 200-year concrete: 5 differences from conventional methods.

The re-vibration and high-density concrete method is a construction technique that removes voids and water channels that cause cracking, and forms a dense structure within the concrete to improve its density. There are five differences between the conventional method and the re-vibration and high-density concrete method regarding "floor level," "footprints," "bubble removal," "vibration application," and "number of workers." 【Five Differences from the Conventional Method】 ○ Can achieve a smooth floor level  ⇒ In the conventional method, the floor level is uneven due to "only vibration application" and "narrow compaction area." ○ No footprints left behind  ⇒ In the conventional method, footprints remain and become a cause of defects. ○ Significant removal of surface voids  ⇒ In the conventional method, the surface becomes bean-shaped, making bubble removal difficult. ○ Enables uniform leveling  ⇒ The vibration in the conventional method has a narrow compaction area, making uniform leveling difficult. ○ Reduction in the number of workers  ⇒ In the conventional method, the number of workers increases, leading to higher labor costs. *For more details, please refer to the catalog or feel free to contact us.

  • others

Added to bookmarks

Bookmarks list

Bookmark has been removed

Bookmarks list

You can't add any more bookmarks

By registering as a member, you can increase the number of bookmarks you can save and organize them with labels.

Free membership registration